Open-ended #immigration – dream or #ParisShooting nightmare?

In the wake of the terrorists’ murder of ten Charlie Hebdo staff and two police officers, London-based commentator Paul Joseph Watson asked on Twitter, ‘To what extent has mass uncontrolled immigration contributed to incidents like the #ParisShooting?’ Watson answers his own question in ‘Paris Shooting: What they’re not telling you’ (, 7 January 2015), talking about the failure of the media to report, and governments to notice, the tragic connections between Islamic extremism and a number of attacks by immigrants (and their children) on people in the nations that have accepted them as residents and citizens.

In March 2014 we asked on this blog ‘Is immigration good for Britain?’ We answered then, ‘No, but it’s worse for Australia’. At the same time, English author David Goodhart published The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-War Immigration. He previewed his book in The Guardian under the title ‘Why the left is wrong about immigration’.

Predictably, Goodhart’s work has attracted defensive negative reviews from ‘the left’ – see for example David Edgar in The Guardian. (*)  A more favourable review of The British Dream was published by David Sexton in the London Evening Standard.

We can now share with our readers an Australian review that is highly critical of the book, badging it as ‘genocidal’. The reviewer acknowledges Goodhart’s worthwhile criticism of the multiculturalism associated with high levels of immigration from non-traditional source countries, but strongly condemns Goodhart’s commitment to open-ended, mass-immigration-induced multi-racialism.

The shift from dream to nightmare is already a reality for victims of the crimes perpetrated by immigrants in the countries that have given them refuge. Britons are waking up to how fast their society is changing and are quitting London in droves. Last month, the Sydney siege showed ‘how the screen door of citizenship has been left open to criminal elements‘. Sweden is facing ‘suicide by immigration’, while Norway’s crime rate dropped significantly when failed asylum-seekers were deported. The massacre in Paris is the latest recurrence of France’s ongoing nightmare.

Immigration policies must be changed to recognise the folly of accepting individuals from groups that cannot accept the values and standards of the community they seek to join. 

We’re with Mark Steyn who has blogged: ‘I’d rather die laughing than live in the cowed, craven serf state the malign alliance of totalitarian Islam and a cowardly western leadership is building for us.’

If you agree with our views, please use every opportunity to share them with decision-makers in government. In Australia, voters in the forthcoming Queensland and New South Wales state elections can take further action by annotating their ballot papers with the REDUCE IMMIGRATION message.


*   Readers might like to reflect on earlier views once held by ‘the left’ on immigration. The founders of the Fabian Society expressed the need for an immigration policy to ensure that Britain excluded ‘human rubbish’ [their words, not ours!] so as to maintain its social equilibrium: see Fabian Essays in Socialism, 5th edition, 1931, page 129.


4 thoughts on “Open-ended #immigration – dream or #ParisShooting nightmare?

  1. Dayanand Saraswati, Indian sage, said in 1883, “Having thus given a cursory view of the Koran, I lay it before the sensible person with the purpose that they should know what kind of a book the Koran is. I have no hesitation to say that it cannot be the work of either God or of a learned man, nor can it be a book of knowledge. Here its very vital defect has been exposed with the object that people may not waste their life falling into its imposition. The Koran is the result of ignorance, the source of animalization of human beings, a fruitful cause of destroying peace, an incentive to war, and propagator of hostility among men and a promoter of suffering in society. As to defect of repetition, the Koran is its store.”

  2. “Any culture that will not defend itself against displacement through mass immigration faces extinction. That includes both time-tested and successful cultures. Embracing diversity results in cultural suicide. America’s multicultural path guarantees its destruction via cultural clashes and conflict with Islam, Mexican and African cultures that diametrically oppose American culture. The more diverse a country, the more destructive and broken-down its future. The more people, the more it destroys its quality of life and standard of living. The more it adds immigrants, the more destruction to its environment. The more it imports refugees, the faster America, Canada, Europe and Australia lose their own ability to function and worse, their identities. Exponential growth of any civilization leads to ultimate collapse. You see it in Africa, India and China today. You will see it in Europe, Canada, Australia and America in the coming years, “IF” Western countries don’t stop all forms of immigration.“ Frosty Wooldridge, 6 continent world bicycle traveler, witness to what’s coming to Western countries as to endless refugee immigration.

  3. Great comments Frosty. Do you have a fb page? Love to share these.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.